|
FULFILLING A DUTY:
THE JAMIE ROBERTS CASE
In recent years,
headlines have ripped across front pages of
newspapers across the state from ambitious,
hyper-partisan District Attorneys (remember Ronnie
Earle vs. Tom DeLay?)
In contrast, Fort Bend County has enjoyed 17 years
of steady leadership from a true public servant.
When he assumed office, John Healey swore an oath to
"preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution
and laws of this state and of the United States."
He bases his prosecution decisions only on facts -
not on political expediency.
The grand jury indictment and trial of Fulshear
Mayor Jamie Roberts proved John Healey's commitment
to his duties and oath of office. Even in the face
of strong political pressure, and the option to
quietly ignore the complaints and Sheriff's Office
investigation for the sake of his own career -
Healey stood resolute and fulfilled his duties to
our system of justice.
Mayor Roberts was a popular local figure. Healey
knew that Roberts had been a trustee of the Lamar
Consolidated Independent School District, and that he had
been Fulshear’s mayor. Healey knew that Roberts was
friends with members of the local media. Jamie
Roberts had been a political supporter of Healey and
had personally endorsed Healey in re-election
efforts. Also, Roberts and Healey had been friends.
But those circumstances were irrelevant to John
Healey's official duty to justice as the Fort Bend
District Attorney. As in every other case, he was
bound by his oath to follow the judicial process -
even if it became politically harmful to do so.
-
When the Grand Jury*
returned an indictment on four separate counts,
setting off a feeding frenzy among local media
to jump on the story - John Healey followed
the judicial process.
-
When Roberts hired a
prominent Houston criminal defense attorney who
began to savage the DA's office in the local
press - John Healey followed the judicial
process.
-
When local
editorials were written, suggesting that the DA
was prosecuting Roberts' case for political
reasons - John Healey followed the judicial
process.
-
When the case was
tried, and the jury returned a verdict of "not
guilty" - John Healey followed the judicial
process.
As reported in the local
media, the Sheriff’s office conducted the
investigation, the case was presented to the Grand
Jury, Mr. Roberts testified before the Grand Jury,
and he was indicted and tried. Some police
investigations reveal that there is insufficient
evidence to be able to prove a case to a jury. These
cases are rejected. Yet, when a case, based on the
facts, deserves to be decided by a jury, and cannot
be resolved through negotiations by both sides, it
will go to a jury. Such was the situation in the
Roberts case. Roberts was found not guilty - which
means that the case could not be proven to that jury
beyond a reasonable doubt. John Healey fully
respects the jury's decision.
But the fact that a jury returns a verdict of not
guilty does not mean that the state should not have
proceeded with the case! Most prosecutor offices
around the nation have successful trial conviction
rates of approximately 72%. In fact, if prosecutor
offices were to try cases and their only concern was
to have a 100% conviction rate, then prosecutors
would shy away from cases where juries would likely
find an accused guilty, but the case would go
untried because it was not a "slam-dunk" conviction.
That type of timidity would result in many guilty
criminals walking the streets.
Only an experienced prosecutor with a strong moral
compass can be counted to make these hard decisions,
even in the face of scathing criticism from local
editorialists. Of course, the Roberts case was never
prominent enough to have ever received a column of
newspaper space in the Houston media, or even a
mention on the Houston news programs. Yet locally,
it was prominently featured in one local newspaper.
John Healey has performed the duties of our District
Attorney for 17 years. From Day 1, he has served our
county well as a fair and balanced prosecutor,
precisely because he has the courage to do what's
right - and not just what is easiest for his
re-election. His responsibilities are to justice.
That kind of commitment is nothing less than what
Fort Bend County deserves. Help keep politics out of
our legal system and vote for true leadership –
Vote John Healey this March 2, 2010.
* A Grand Jury is a group of citizens appointed by a
District Judge to hear information regarding
possible criminal conduct. To indict and allow the
case to proceed, nine of the twelve members must
find “probable cause” that a crime was committed. In
essence, they must find that a crime probably had
occurred.
|
|